With a different take, this treatment further suggests that the couple continued to work together much longer than other authors have indicated. We examine various papers and compare the content of each subsequent paper to the work that Mileva was performing. Some interpretations of the usage of pronouns in those letters during 18 are re-examined, and a different hypothesis regarding the usage of those pronouns is introduced. Secondly, the contents of letters from both Albert and Mileva.
Firstly, the sequence of events that happened and the couple’s relationship at particular times. In additional to a biographical sketch, comments by various authors are compared and contrasted concerning two narratives. Then a combined journal is described, detailing significant events. Separate biographies are outlined for both Mileva and Albert, prior to their attendance at Zürich Polytechnic in 1896. This is a contemporary review of the involvement of Mileva Marić, Albert Einstein’s first wife, in his theoretical work between the period of 1900 to 1905. Using the reception of relativity as a case study, the essay also discusses issues involving the historical study of modern Chinese science. Einstein has since become the symbol in China of the unity of science and democracy, the two eminent objectives of the May Fourth Movement that remain to be achieved in full. China’s economic reforms in the late 1970s empowered scientists and presented them with the opportunity to rehabilitate Einstein and call for social democracy. During the Cultural Revolution, radical Chinese ideologues sponsored organized campaigns against Einstein and relativity, inflicting serious damage on Chinese science and scientific education. This unique passion for and openness to relativity, which helped advance the study of theoretical physics in China in the 1930s, was gradually replaced by imported Soviet criticism after 1949. Having introduced the theory of relativity from Japan, the Chinese quickly and enthusiastically embraced it during the May Fourth Movement, virtually without controversy.
0 kommentar(er)
